WEBVTT

2
00:00:04.687 --> 00:00:15.573
COUNSEL.  (APPEARANCES TENDERED).             
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER:  GOOD AFTERNOON AND

3
00:00:15.573 --> 00:00:22.361
WELCOME I WANT TO REMIND COUNSEL OR I'LL SAY
THANK YOU TO COUNSEL TO LIMIT THE THE ONE

4
00:00:22.361 --> 00:00:27.680
QUESTION IF FRONT OF THE COURT ON CERTIFICATION. 
THE TRP TAGS OF LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE.

5
00:00:27.680 --> 00:00:40.731
MS. MANTELL.  OF.              NATALIE H.
MANTELL:  THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR RNGS MAY IT

6
00:00:40.731 --> 00:00:44.780
PLEASE THE COURT.  MAY I RESERVE 3 MINUTES FOR
REBUTTAL.              CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER: 

7
00:00:44.780 --> 00:00:49.273
IF YOU CAN TRY TO COPE KROR VOICE UP.            
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  WILL DO.  ALTHOUGH

8
00:00:49.273 --> 00:00:55.508
THE APPELLATE DIVISION GOT A LOT RIGHT, IT ERRED
IN INTERPRETING THE TERM LOCAL TELEPHONE

9
00:00:55.508 --> 00:01:02.657
HAD N.J.S.A. 54:4-1, IN A WAY THAT IS AT ODDS OF
WITH THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE

10
00:01:02.657 --> 00:01:09.594
WHICH IS KNOWN ATS BUSINESS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX
OR VP P T.  AND IT IS AT LODZ WITH 

11
00:01:09.594 --> 00:01:15.160
THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT.               THE B P P T
WAS AM MENTD IN 1997 TO ROW VICE THE

12
00:01:15.160 --> 00:01:19.518
TABSES SCHEME ON 3 LOCAL TELL XHUN OCCASIONS
CARRY YERTS, DURING THE ONDPOEING TRANSITION

13
00:01:19.518 --> 00:01:25.851
TO A COMPETITIVE MARKET.  FOLLOWING THE BREAKUP
OF AT&T, THE DIVESTITURE OF THE BABY BELLS

14
00:01:25.851 --> 00:01:30.654
INCLUDING NEW JERSEY BELL WHICH NOW VERY RYE SON
AND THE FELD RUL TELL COMMUNE KATHSS

15
00:01:30.654 --> 00:01:37.875
ASHTH OF 1996.  THE B P P T DOES SEVERAL THING,
IMPORTANTLY IT RK NIETDZ IN THE VERY 1ST

16
00:01:37.875 --> 00:01:41.991
SENTENCE THAT CERTAIN PERSON UNTIL PROPERTY CAN
BE EXCLUDED FROM OPERATION OF THIS CHAPTER. 

17
00:01:41.991 --> 00:01:48.333
THAT'S DISPIKTS AN AXE EM SHUN WHICH IS NOT AT
ISSUE HERE.               THE ALSOS SPECIFIES

18
00:01:48.333 --> 00:01:54.029
HOW THE TAX OCHTS THE SRN PERSONAL PROPERTY YOUFD
IN THE BUSINESS OF LOCAL EX CHAFRM TELEPHONE

19
00:01:54.029 --> 00:01:59.577
COMPANIES THAT WERE SUBJECT TO THE GROETS
RECEIPTS AND TRAN CHIES TAX AS OF APRIL 1,

20
00:01:59.577 --> 00:02:06.156
1997, WHICH IS UNDISPUTED THAT VER ROY SON WAS AND
THIS IS KEY, THE DEFINES LOCAL EX CHAFRM

21
00:02:06.156 --> 00:02:12.043
TELEPHONE COMPANY AS TL COMMUNICATION CARRIER
PROVIDING DIAL TONE AND ACCESS TO 51 PERCENT

22
00:02:12.043 --> 00:02:17.670
OF THE LOCAL TELEPHONE EX CHAFRMG.  SO IF A LOCAL
TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER IS NOT PROVIDING

23
00:02:17.670 --> 00:02:22.575
DIAL TONE AND ACCESS TO 51 PERCENT OF A LOCAL
TELEPHONE EX CHAFRM RGS THEN THE TAX DOES

24
00:02:22.575 --> 00:02:26.425
NOT APPLY.               BUT IT DOESN'T DEFINE
WHAT COULDN'T STOUTS A LOCAL TELEPHONE

25
00:02:26.425 --> 00:02:31.325
EX CHAFRM WHICH IS WHY WE'RE HERE.  SO WHAT DID
THE LEGISLATURE MEAN WHIT SAID LOCAL

26
00:02:31.325 --> 00:02:37.030
TELEPHONE EX CHAFRM?  VERIZON, THE LEADING LOCAL
TELEPHONE PRO VOITD ISN'T NEW JERSEY AND

27
00:02:37.030 --> 00:02:43.488
THE INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE HAVE DWIEPD THAT TERM THE
SAME WAY VER VERIZON DOES HERE.  THAT

28
00:02:43.488 --> 00:02:50.232
DEFINITION IS THE ARRAY OF CUSTOMERS SERVED BY
THE N P NXX CODES ASSOCIATE WITH THE

29
00:02:50.232 --> 00:02:56.731
PARTICULAR RATE SEN, NPA/NXX COATS RAILROAD REALLY
CARRY CODE AND EX CHACHL IN A TELEPHONE

30
00:02:56.731 --> 00:03:02.080
NUMBER WHICH WE'RE ALL VERY FAMILIAR WITH. 
VERIZON HAS KIFRT AL USED THAT DEFINITION

31
00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:06.684
TO CALCULATE ITS MARKET SHARE WITHIN A LOCAL
TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, BOTH WHIT HAD MORE THAN

32
00:03:06.684 --> 00:03:12.169
51 PERCENT OF THE MARKET SHARE AND WHIT NO MG ERR
DID.  THAT'S THE WAY VERIZON HAS DONE

33
00:03:12.169 --> 00:03:16.699
IT FROM THE BEGINNING.  IT YOU'VE THE INFORMATION
VIEBL TO IT AND ACTED MORE THAN REASONABLY

34
00:03:16.699 --> 00:03:22.088
IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY REGULATIONS SPECIFYING HOW
THIS CALCULATION SHOULD BE MADE.  AND

35
00:03:22.088 --> 00:03:28.567
NOBODY QUESTIONED THAT CALCULATION THE UNTIL
VERIZON HAD LESS THAN 51 PERCENT.            

36
00:03:28.567 --> 00:03:32.908
VERIZON DEFINITION IS CONSISTENT WITH LAW AND
STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLES.  IT'S

37
00:03:32.908 --> 00:03:38.217
THE SAME DEFINITION YOUFD IN THE NEW JERSEY
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND BY THE U.S. SUPREME

38
00:03:38.217 --> 00:03:44.087
COURT P OTHER STATES T LEGISLATURE INCORPORATED
THAT TERM OF ART INTO THE B P P T.  BUT

39
00:03:44.087 --> 00:03:48.887
THE APPELLATE DIVISION IGNORED THE LEGISLATURE'S
USE OF INDUSTRY TERMINOLOGY AND EVEN

40
00:03:48.887 --> 00:03:55.463
SAID THAT THE LEGISLATURE WOULD NOT HAVE
UNDERSTOOD THAT TERM, FWHULT IS CONTRARY TO

41
00:03:55.463 --> 00:04:01.158
BASIC CANNONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND NUMBER
CORRECTED.               HELP WELL CLAIMS

42
00:04:01.158 --> 00:04:05.924
THAT MAPS DEFINE THE EX CHAFRN RNS BUT JUST
BECAUSE THERE'S A GEOGRAPHICAL COMPONENT TO

43
00:04:05.924 --> 00:04:12.218
A LOCAL TELEPHONE EX CHAFRMG DID NOT MEAN THAT
GEOGRAPHY DRIVES THE ANALYSIS MUCH THE

44
00:04:12.218 --> 00:04:17.430
LOCATION OF CUSTOMERS WITH THE SAME AREA CODE AND
EX CHAFRM TIED TO A PARTICULAR RATE CENTER

45
00:04:17.430 --> 00:04:25.915
DRIVES WHAT THE MAP LOOKS LIEKS.  THE MAP IS THE
RESULT, NOT THE CAUSE.  THE AREA CODE

46
00:04:25.915 --> 00:04:33.547
AND EX CHAFRMG CAN BE DEPICTED AS HAVING
GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES, BUT THEY DON'T

47
00:04:33.547 --> 00:04:39.335
RECALL THE ANSWER.               AFTER DERG LAGS,
THE CUSTOMERS WITH THE CERTAIN AREA CODE

48
00:04:39.335 --> 00:04:45.205
AND EXCHANGE WERE THE CLUSTERED.  SORRY, BEFORE
DOUGH REGULATION, THEY WERE CLUSTERED.

49
00:04:45.205 --> 00:04:50.404
AFTER DEREGULATION, THEY WERE NO LONGER
CLUSTERED, BUT THE DEFINITION OF LOCAL

50
00:04:50.404 --> 00:04:58.553
TELEPHONE EX CHAFRMG, THE NPA/NXX CODES TIED TO
THE LOCAL RATE CENTER DID NOT CHAFRMG K.

51
00:04:58.553 --> 00:05:03.347
THE APPELLATE DIVISION'S ROIRT TO
YOUS A MAP FROM 1974 TO DEFINE A LOCAL

52
00:05:03.347 --> 00:05:09.666
TELEPHONE EX CHAFRMG TODAY IGNORES THE
LEGISLATURE'S USE OF INDUSTRY TERMINOLOGY OF

53
00:05:09.666 --> 00:05:15.748
THWARTS THE INTENT TO ENCOURAGE THE KET NIGS THE
LOCAL TELEPHONE MARKET BY ELIMINATING

54
00:05:15.748 --> 00:05:23.169
THE TAX ONCE COMPETITION EXISTS, VERIZON ASKS
ADOPT VERIZON'S INTERPRETATION OF LOCAL

55
00:05:23.169 --> 00:05:28.609
ENGS CHAM RGS ENTER JUDGMENT IN ITS FAVOR AND
DIRECT THE MRT DIVISION T PUB MISH THAT

56
00:05:28.609 --> 00:05:34.376
PORTION OF ITS OPINION HOLDING THAT THE STATUTE
AP EMPLOYS ANNUALLY.               THAT

57
00:05:34.376 --> 00:05:39.246
CONCLUDE MY OPENING I'M HAPPY TO ANTS ANY
QUESTIONS THE COURT MAY HAVE.              

58
00:05:39.246 --> 00:05:42.239
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER:  SO IT'S A TERM OF ART WE
SHOULD LOOK AT THE TECHNICAL MEEPING OF THE

59
00:05:42.239 --> 00:05:46.788
PHRASE AT THE TIME OF THE LEGISLATION WAS ENACT,
CORRECT?  P.              NATALIE H. MANTELL:

60
00:05:46.788 --> 00:05:52.091
YES.               CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER:  WHAT
DOES TARIFF A-5 DO IN TERMS OF INFORMING

61
00:05:52.091 --> 00:05:55.469
THE MEEPG OF THE PHRASE.               NATALIE H.
MANTELL:  YOUR HONOR, BOTH THE TARIFF

62
00:05:55.469 --> 00:06:02.897
THAT WAS IN EFFECT IN 1997 AS WELL AS THE PRODUCT
GUIDE THAT EXISTS NOW DEFINES EXCHANGE

63
00:06:02.897 --> 00:06:11.914
AS A UNIT THAT WAS CREATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF,
LET ME QUOTE IT ACTUAL,' UNIT ESTABLISHED

64
00:06:11.914 --> 00:06:17.139
BY VERIZON FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF
COMMUNICATION SERVICE WHICH USUALLY EM

65
00:06:17.139 --> 00:06:21.987
BRATSDZ A CITY, TOWN OR VIL HITCH AND THE EN
VOIRNING AND CONSISTS OF ONE OR MORE CENTRAL

66
00:06:21.987 --> 00:06:27.535
AUFTSS WHICH MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN OR WITHOUT THE
BOUN DWREE DEGREES OF THE EX CHAFRM,

67
00:06:27.535 --> 00:06:35.024
BOW THE PRODUCT AND TAR GIVE, THE SAME WAP
VERIZON DOES HERE, REFERENCE TO THE P N A N

68
00:06:35.024 --> 00:06:40.244
XX CODES AND THE AREN'T EXCHANGE.             
JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  IT DOES NOT AND CLOUD

69
00:06:40.244 --> 00:06:43.435
THOSE WORDS.               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 
IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THOSE WORD BUT THE

70
00:06:43.435 --> 00:06:49.595
UNIT THAT IT REFERS TO IS THE NPA/NXX CODES, THE
YOUNT IS NOT A MAP AND IT ALSO BEARS

71
00:06:49.595 --> 00:06:53.651
NOTING THAT.              JUSTICE WAINER APTER: 
THE DEFINITION IS THE UNIT ESTABLISH

72
00:06:53.651 --> 00:07:01.014
BD BY VERIZON THAT MEANS ONE CODE?              
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  NO, IT IS THE SPECIFIC

73
00:07:01.014 --> 00:07:07.365
CODES THAT ARE TIED TO THE RATE CENTER.  SO THE,
IT ALSO, THIS IS WHAT I WAS ABOUT TO

74
00:07:07.365 --> 00:07:11.139
SAY, YOUR HONOR, WHICH I BELIEVE AVENSS YOUR
QUESTION, THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE

75
00:07:11.139 --> 00:07:17.804
LTS DEFINES EXCHANGE BY REFERENCE TO THE NXX
CODE, IT SPECIFICALLY SAYS THE NXX CODE

76
00:07:17.804 --> 00:07:24.183
DENOTES THE EXCHANGE AREA WITHIN AN AREA CODE.  SO
THE NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE,

77
00:07:24.183 --> 00:07:27.913
BUT --              JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  THAT
DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE NXX CODE,

78
00:07:27.913 --> 00:07:33.644
THE EGS CHANGE AREA WITHIN AN AREA CODE COULD
ALSO BE A GEOGRAPHIC AREA?              

79
00:07:33.644 --> 00:07:37.577
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  NO, YOUR HONOR, THE
ADMINISTRATIVE SAYS THE NXX CODE DENOTES THE

80
00:07:37.577 --> 00:07:44.188
AREA CODE -- SORRY, LET ME BACK UP.  THE NXX CODE
DENOTES THE EX CHAMG AREA WITHIN AN AREA

81
00:07:44.188 --> 00:07:50.948
CODE.  SO AGAIN THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE IS TYING
THE GEOGRAPHIC AREA TO THE NXX CODE. 

82
00:07:50.948 --> 00:07:55.490
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER:  YOUR TARIFF
AND THE PRODUCT GUIDE EX STREGS THE SAY

83
00:07:55.490 --> 00:08:00.193
THE TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES OF THE EXCHANGE AREAS
ARE WHAT ARE DEPICTED IN EACH OF THESE. 

84
00:08:00.193 --> 00:08:04.443
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  YOUR HONOR,
SDILT SAY THAT, AND THE THE PRODUCT GUIDE

85
00:08:04.443 --> 00:08:09.442
IS MERELY A CARRY-OVER FROM THE TARIFF WHICH WAS
A GEOGRAPHIC SHTHS, FORGIVE ME, A REGULATORY

86
00:08:09.442 --> 00:08:20.825
REQUIREMENT.  BUT AS OUR ARE WITNESS TESTIFIED
DURING THE TRIAL, THE MAPs ARE MERE

87
00:08:20.825 --> 00:08:27.372
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE CUSTOMERS WITH CERTAIN
NPA/NXX CODES, THAT'S HOW THE MAP OF THE

88
00:08:27.372 --> 00:08:32.608
HOPEWELL EXCHANGE WAS CROW 88ED IN THE FIRST
PLACE IN 1974.  IT WAS THE LOCATION OF THE

89
00:08:32.608 --> 00:08:38.651
CUSTOMERS WITH THE NPA/NXX CODES TIED TO THE
HOPEWELL RATE CENTER.               SO THE

90
00:08:38.651 --> 00:08:47.671
QUESTION THE BEFORE THE COURT REALLY IS WHEN PT
SHOULD THE COURT, OR WHEN SHOULD THE LOCAL

91
00:08:47.671 --> 00:08:55.166
TELEPHONE EXCHANGE BE DETERMINED?  SHOULD THE BE
DETERMINED BARK IN 1974 WHEN THAT MAP

92
00:08:55.166 --> 00:09:00.890
WAS CREATED OR SHOULD IT BE DETERMINED IN THE
PRESENT DAY?  AND I WOULD SUBMIT CONSISTENT

93
00:09:00.890 --> 00:09:08.859
WITH THE LANG WIF OF THE STATUTE AND THE
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY, THE STATUTE IS FLUID. 

94
00:09:08.859 --> 00:09:17.563
THE STATUTE ENVISIONING AN ONGOING PROVISION OF
LOCAL TELEPHONE SERVICE UP TO A POINT WHERE

95
00:09:17.563 --> 00:09:25.599
COMPETITION EXISTS.  AND ONCE COMPETITION EXISTS
OVER TIME, THEN THE STATUTE SAYS THAT THE

96
00:09:25.599 --> 00:09:36.100
TAX NO LONGER APPLIES.  AND SO THE, I FOR DPOT MY
TRAIN OF THOUGHT, YOU WERE, I APOLOGIZE. 

97
00:09:36.100 --> 00:09:45.276
DPOEING BACK TO YOUR QUESTION, THE, OH, THIS WHAT
I WAS GOING TO SAY, THE WITNESS AT TRIAL,

98
00:09:45.276 --> 00:09:52.464
MR. WEST, TESTIFIED THAT AFTER DEREGULATION, THE
MAPS WERE NO LONGER ACCURATE.  AND THEY

99
00:09:52.464 --> 00:09:58.035
COULDN'T BE ACCURATE BECAUSE VERIZON DOESN'T HAVE
THE INFORMATION THAT IS NECESSARY TO

100
00:09:58.035 --> 00:10:03.842
CREATE A MAP NOW BECAUSE IT DOESN'T HAVE ALL OF
THE LOCATIONS OF THE CUSTOMERS OF ITS

101
00:10:03.842 --> 00:10:10.923
COMPETITORS.  AND THAT WOULD BE WHAT WOULD BE
REQUIRED TO CREATE A MAP, THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE

102
00:10:10.923 --> 00:10:16.099
BECAUSE VERIZON DOESN'T HAVE ALL OF THAT
INFORMATION.               SO WHEN IT'S KUFT

103
00:10:16.099 --> 00:10:22.828
MRS. WERE CLUSTERED, WHEN IT WAS THE OPENLY
SERVICE PROEF VIETD IN THE STATE BACK IN 1974

104
00:10:22.828 --> 00:10:31.223
AND AUM THE WAY THROUGH 1996 WHEN THE B.P.U.
FIRST STARTED INVESTIGATING COMPETITION,

105
00:10:31.223 --> 00:10:40.066
VERIZON KNEW THE LOCATION OF ITS CUSTOMERS AND
COULD MAP AND MAP THEIR LOCATIONS AND THEY

106
00:10:40.066 --> 00:10:48.267
WERE CLUSTERED IN A CERTAIN AREA.  BUT AFTER
DEREGULATION, WHEN COMPETITIVE LOCAL EX

107
00:10:48.267 --> 00:10:55.815
CHAFRMG COMPANIES CAME IN, THEY CAN NO LONGER MAP
THE LOCATION OF ALL THE CUSTOMERS WITHIN

108
00:10:55.815 --> 00:11:03.423
A LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE.               AND
ALSO -- THE.              JUSTICE SOLOMON: 

109
00:11:03.423 --> 00:11:09.832
IS THAT BECAUSE OF DEREGULATION THAT THEY CAN'T
MAP WHERE THEY AND THEIR COMPETITORS ARE

110
00:11:09.832 --> 00:11:16.602
OR IS THAT BECAUSE THE WHOLE WAY THAT THOSE
THINGS ARE CONFIGURED HAS CHANGED WITH

111
00:11:16.602 --> 00:11:21.582
TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES?  THAT THE PEOPLE WITH THE
EX CHAFRMG AREN'T NECESSARILY LIVING

112
00:11:21.582 --> 00:11:27.200
OR WORKING ANYWHERE NEAR HOPEWELL?  ISN'T THAT
THE PROBLEM?               NATALIE H.

113
00:11:27.200 --> 00:11:31.031
MANTELL:  IT'S BOTH FSHGS YOUR HONOR.             
JUSTICE SOLOMON:  TO WHAT EXTENT OR

114
00:11:31.031 --> 00:11:35.770
EITHER.               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 
BECAUSE OF DEREGULATION, THE ENTRANCE OF

115
00:11:35.770 --> 00:11:44.442
COMPETITORS INTO THE MARKET ALLOWED THE
COMPETITORS TO ASSIGN NPA/NXX CODES TO

116
00:11:44.442 --> 00:11:50.615
CUSTOMERS THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY LOCATED WITHIN
THE MAP, SO TO SPEAK.               JUSTICE

117
00:11:50.615 --> 00:11:53.442
SOLOMON:  THEY COULD BE LOCATED WITHIN THE MAP.   
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  THEY

118
00:11:53.442 --> 00:11:56.626
COULD BE BUT THEY DON'T HAVE T.              
JUSTICE SOLOMON:  MAYBE I INTERRUPTED WHAT

119
00:11:56.626 --> 00:12:01.504
YOU WERE SAYING BUT WE ALSO DON'T KNOW WHERE THE
COMPETITORS ARE IN OR OUTSIDE THE HOPEWELL.

120
00:12:01.504 --> 00:12:05.946
RIGHT?               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 
CORRECT.               JUSTICE SOLOMON: 

121
00:12:05.946 --> 00:12:22.932
OKAY.  TECHNOLOGY, THAT EFFECT.  CAN.             
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  BUT WE THE ADD VNTS

122
00:12:22.932 --> 00:12:32.083
OF TECHNOLOGY, IT IS REALLY DOES MAKE THE MAPS
OBSOLETE, TO BE FRANK, BECAUSE I ADVENT

123
00:12:32.083 --> 00:12:37.302
OF TECHNOLOGY, THE MAPS WERE ORIGINALLY PUT INTO
THE TARIFF AND THEN INTO THE PRODUCT

124
00:12:37.302 --> 00:12:45.722
GUIDE TO COMMUNICATE THE BILLING OF CERTAIN
TELEPHONE CALLS, RIGHT, I MEAN WE ALL LEB

125
00:12:45.722 --> 00:12:51.866
GETTING A TELEPHONE BILL THAT HAD CERTAIN CALLS
AND CERTAIN EXCHANGES, THEY WERE EITHER

126
00:12:51.866 --> 00:12:57.662
LEL OR LONG DISTANCE, THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN ANYMORE
AND THAT HASN'T HAPPENED SINCE LONG

127
00:12:57.662 --> 00:13:10.155
BEFORE 2008 WHEN THIS CASE AROSE.              
SO THE MAPS NO LONGER REFLECT THE ACCURACY --

128
00:13:10.155 --> 00:13:16.292
THE INACCURATE LOCAL TESTIFY EX CHAFRMG.  AND
THAT'S REALLY THE ISSUE THAT WE HAVE. 

129
00:13:16.292 --> 00:13:26.226
BECAUSE THE NPA/NXX CODES CONTINUE TO REFLECT THE
LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE.  THE MAPS NO

130
00:13:26.226 --> 00:13:33.226
LONGER DO.               JUSTICE WAINER APTER: 
THE STATUTE IS FLUID, BUT WE ARE LOOKING

131
00:13:33.226 --> 00:13:39.775
AT A STATUTORY DEFINITION.  WE ARE TRYING TO
DEFINE THE TERM AS OF THE TIME THAT THE 

132
00:13:39.775 --> 00:13:43.905
LEGISLATURE PUT IT IN A STATUTE, CORRECT?         
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  YES.              

133
00:13:43.905 --> 00:13:47.910
JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT THE
MEANING OF THE TERM CHANGES OVER TIME? 

134
00:13:47.910 --> 00:13:52.548
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  NO, THE MEANING
OF THE TERM IS THE SAME.  AND IT WAS.

135
00:13:52.548 --> 00:13:55.595
JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  LOOK AT WHAT
THE TERM MEPTS IN 1989 COMBH THE STATUTE

136
00:13:55.595 --> 00:14:01.770
WAS ORIGINALLY PASSED OR 1997 WHEN IT WAS ACHLED
TO DEFINE THIS PHRASE, CORRECT?              

137
00:14:01.770 --> 00:14:05.663
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  CORRECT.              
JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  19 NOUCH A PRESUMABLY

138
00:14:05.663 --> 00:14:09.225
WHEN TWU END ANLDED TO DEFINE THITS PHRASE.      
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  AND IT WAS ON

139
00:14:09.225 --> 00:14:12.957
THE HEELS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996. 
AND EVERYBODY IN THE INDUSTRY UNDERSTOOD

140
00:14:12.957 --> 00:14:17.799
WHAT THAT TERM MEANT.  THIS NOT A DID HE HAVE
NITHS THAT HAS CHANGED.  AT THIS TIME A

141
00:14:17.799 --> 00:14:22.567
TERM OF ART THAT THAT BEEN YOUFD IN THE INDUSTRY
FOR DECADES REALLY.               JUSTICE

142
00:14:22.567 --> 00:14:25.363
WAINER APTER:  AS THE CHIEF POISONED YOU OUT IN
YOUR MATERIALS FROM THAT TIME AND EVEN

143
00:14:25.363 --> 00:14:32.286
ALL THE WAY, I THINK IT WAS FROM 1993 TO 2014,
YOU SPECIFICALLY STATED THAT THE LATAS,

144
00:14:32.286 --> 00:14:39.316
ENCOMPASS CONTINUOUS LOCAL EXCHANGE AREAS.       
SO FOOR HE WILL EXCHANGE AREA

145
00:14:39.316 --> 00:14:44.524
TO BE CONTIGUOUS RGS DOESN'T VITS TO HAVE
GEOGRAPHY OR DOESN'T IT HAVE TO BE GEOGRAPHIC

146
00:14:44.524 --> 00:14:48.705
IN SOME WAY?               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 
IT DOES, YOU WERE RGS AND IN AT THE TIME

147
00:14:48.705 --> 00:14:54.952
IN 1993 UP THE IN THE STATUTE ACH AP THIS WAS
1993 THROUGH TWOJ TREEN THAT YOU SAID THIS. 

148
00:14:54.952 --> 00:14:59.790
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  YES, YOU WERE
RNGS BECAUSE IN 2014 THE MRUKT GUIDE REPLACED

149
00:14:59.790 --> 00:15:09.428
THE TARIFF.               BUT AT THE TIME WHEN
THE STATUTE WAS ENACTED IN 1997, THE PT

150
00:15:09.428 --> 00:15:17.911
L T E WAS CONTIGUOUS BECAUSE VERIZON WAS A
MONOPOLY AND IT WAS A SOO, AL AGO YOU SETD

151
00:15:17.911 --> 00:15:23.411
LATA ENCOMPASSES CONTIGUOUS LOCAL EKTS CHAFRM
AREAS IMPLYING THAT THE LOCAL EX CHAFRM

152
00:15:23.411 --> 00:15:26.747
AESHS WERE THEPTSZ SOMETHING THAT COULD BE
CONTIGUOUS.               NATALIE H. MANTELL:

153
00:15:26.747 --> 00:15:34.549
SO A COUPLE OF THOUGHTS HERE, YOU WERE.  1ST IS A
LATA IS SEPARATE FROM A LOCAL TELEPHONE,

154
00:15:34.549 --> 00:15:43.135
THERE ARE THREE LATAS IN NEW JERSEY, THEY'RE VERY
LARGE AREAS AND.              JUSTICE WAINER

155
00:15:43.135 --> 00:15:47.723
APTER:  UNDERSTOOD AND THERE ARE A NUMBER OF LOCAL
HE CAN CHACHLS WITHIN EACH ONE.             

156
00:15:47.723 --> 00:15:54.989
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  CORRECT, AND IN 1987 AND 1993
WHEN THE TARIFF WAS CREATED, THOSE L

157
00:15:54.989 --> 00:16:01.630
T E, THE LOCAL TELEPHONE EX CHAFRMS WITHIN THE
LAN ERR LATAS WERE CONTIGUOUS BECAUSE VERIZON

158
00:16:01.630 --> 00:16:09.413
HAD A MONOPOLY AT THE TIME.  AGRICULTURE THE TIME
IS 1993 TWOJ 2014.              NATALIE H.

159
00:16:09.413 --> 00:16:13.923
MANTELL:  THE DIN CHANGE ESSENTIALLY.  AGRICULTURE
YOU DECIDED TO CHACHLG OR NOT CHAFRM

160
00:16:13.923 --> 00:16:18.067
SO DON'T YOU HAVE TO LIVE TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO
DESCRIBE WHATEVER IT WAS FOR THE PURPOSES

161
00:16:18.067 --> 00:16:21.917
OF THE LEGISLATURE'S UNDERSTANDING WHAT EXACTLY
IT WAS THEY WERE PUTTING INTO THE STATUTE? 

162
00:16:21.917 --> 00:16:26.970
THEY COULD TAKE YOUR DEP NIGS AND UNDERSTAND THAT
IT WAS GEE GRAPHIC AND BELIEVE WHEN

163
00:16:26.970 --> 00:16:31.581
THEFRP ENACTS THE STATUTE THAT IT WAS GEE GRAPHIC
BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU TOLD THEM IN

164
00:16:31.581 --> 00:16:36.369
1997 OR 1989.               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 
YOUR HONOR, THE LEGISLATURE UNDERSTOOD

165
00:16:36.369 --> 00:16:45.004
THAT LOCAL TELEPHONE EX CHAFRMG WAS TIED TO THE
NPA/NXX CODES.  IT WASN'T SOLELY GEOGRAPHIC. 

166
00:16:45.004 --> 00:16:49.809
IT HAS A GEOGRAPHIC COMPONENT BECAUSE THE
LOCATIONS OF THE CUSTOMERS WITH THOSE CONCERN

167
00:16:49.809 --> 00:16:55.615
NPA/NXX CODES CAN BE PLOTTED ON A MAP AND THAT'S
EXACTLY HOW THEY WERE PLOT THE IN 1974.

168
00:16:55.615 --> 00:17:02.819
AND THAT'S HOW THEY CONTINUED TO BE PLOTTED IN
1993 AND IN 1997.               AFTER

169
00:17:02.819 --> 00:17:13.272
1997, THERE CAME COMPETITION.  TN AS A RESULT OF
THAT COMPETITION, IT WAS NO LONGER POSSIBLE

170
00:17:13.272 --> 00:17:24.235
TO PLOT EVERY KUFT MIR WITHIN, WITH CERTAIN
NPA/NXX CODES ON A MAP BECAUSE -- ACH AP IN

171
00:17:24.235 --> 00:17:29.648
2014 AS THE CHIEF JUSTICE POISONED OUT THE MAPS
SHOWED THE TERRITORIAL BOUNDARY OF EACH

172
00:17:29.648 --> 00:17:33.803
EXCHANGE AREA?               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 
THAT'S TRUE, YOUR HONOR, AND I HAVE

173
00:17:33.803 --> 00:17:41.978
TO CONCEDE THAT THAT'S WHAT THE PRODUCT GUIDE
SAYS, BUT ALSO WRANT TO LET THE COURT KNOW

174
00:17:41.978 --> 00:17:45.713
THAT WAS A REGULATORY REQUIREMENT, TO HAVE THAT
PRODUCT GUIDE THE ON FIEM WAS A REGULATORY

175
00:17:45.713 --> 00:17:53.144
REQUIREMENT.  BUT IN TWOJ --              JUSTICE
WAINER APTER:  IT IT'S EXISTENCE WAS

176
00:17:53.144 --> 00:17:59.284
A REGULATORY RIERT, BUT THEY DIDN'T TERRITORIAL A
ENGS CHAFRM AREA.              NATALIE H.

177
00:17:59.284 --> 00:18:08.264
MANTELL:  THAT'S TRUE, YOU WERE, BUT THE PRODUCT
GUIDE, IT WAS REALLY, THE MAP REALLY 

178
00:18:08.264 --> 00:18:19.044
EBBS SIFTED FOR AT THAT TIME FOR CONVENIENCE, SO
TO SPEAK.  AT THAT TIME BOTH IN 2014 AND

179
00:18:19.044 --> 00:18:27.357
MUCH EARLIER THAN THAT, THE WAY THAT PRICING WAS
DONE IN THE INDUSTRY CHANGED COMPLETELY.

180
00:18:27.357 --> 00:18:36.029
SO THE MAPs WEREN'T USED ANYMORE EVEN AT THAT
TIME TO IDENTIFY THE PRICE OF A CERTAIN

181
00:18:36.029 --> 00:18:42.545
CALL.  IT WAS CALLED ZONE PRICING, THERE WAS NO
ZONE PRICING ANYMORE IN 2014 OR EVEN IN

182
00:18:42.545 --> 00:18:51.168
PT 2008.  THE EDGE TIRE INDUSTRY CHAFRMED AS
JUSTICE SHOL MON NOTED.               SO

183
00:18:51.168 --> 00:18:57.625
THE MAPS ARE ROLLY OBSOLETE.  THE Ary ROLLY A WAY
FOR LAYPEOPLE TO GENERALLY UNDERSTAND

184
00:18:57.625 --> 00:19:05.245
WHAT A LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE IS.  BUT THAT'S
NOT THE DEFINITION, THAT'S NOT WHAT THE

185
00:19:05.245 --> 00:19:11.345
LEGISLATURE UNDERSTOOD IN 1997 TO BE THE DID HE
HAVE NITHS.               AND ALSO KEEP IN

186
00:19:11.345 --> 00:19:16.147
MAY I APPROACH ARE THE INDUSTRY WAS HEAVILY
INVOLVED IN CRAFTING THIS STATUTE.  THAT'S

187
00:19:16.147 --> 00:19:26.112
IN THE PAST MEMO, THAT'S EVERYWHERE.  IT'S REEL,
IT WAS REALLY A JOINT EFFORT BY LOTS

188
00:19:26.112 --> 00:19:34.529
OF INTERESTED PARTIES TO CRAFT THIS LEGISLATION. 
AND, AS I SAID, TWA MUCH 0 THE HEELS

189
00:19:34.529 --> 00:19:39.716
OF THE MANY TELL COMMUNICATION ACT OF 19 NIBS,
WHICH OVERHAULED THE ENTIRE STREEN DPOT

190
00:19:39.716 --> 00:19:47.350
INDUSTRY READY FOR COMPETITION.               SO
IF EVERYBODY UNDERSTOOD AT THE TIME THAT

191
00:19:47.350 --> 00:19:55.373
IT WAS, WHAT A LOCAL TELEPHONE EX CHAFRM WAS. 
AND I THINK WHAT IS REALLY TELLING IS WHAT

192
00:19:55.373 --> 00:20:01.821
I MENTIONED BEFORE WHICH IS THE NEW JERSEY
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PUT THAT, CODIFIED THAT

193
00:20:01.821 --> 00:20:11.652
UNDERSTANDING INTO -- LELTS ME BAG UP.  THE
B.P.U. CODIFIED THAT UNDERSTANDING NO THE

194
00:20:11.652 --> 00:20:14.715
NEW JERSEY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.              
JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  CAN YOU TELL THUS

195
00:20:14.715 --> 00:20:22.407
CITATION ONE MORE TIME.               NATALIE H.
MANTELL:  N.J.A.C. SECTION 14:10-311.

196
00:20:22.407 --> 00:20:33.794
AND SO THE B.P.U. ALSO UNDERSTOOD
THAT THIS TERM MEANT, IT WAS WITH REFERENCE

197
00:20:33.794 --> 00:20:43.167
TO THE NPA/NXX CODES.  THAT WAS THE INDUSTRY
UNDERSTANDING.  AND IT WAS ESSENTIALLIES

198
00:20:43.167 --> 00:20:51.999
APPROACH WAS RATIFIED IN 2007.  AND THAT IS ALSO
BEARS SOMETHING BECAUSE IT WAS BEFORE

199
00:20:51.999 --> 00:21:01.288
VERIZON SENT THE LETTER TO HOPE PEL IN THIS CASE
THAT HIT FALL LEP BELOW 51 PERCENT BASED

200
00:21:01.288 --> 00:21:07.794
UPON THAT INTERPRETATION.  AND IT WAS REASONABLE
FOR VERIZON TO ROW LIE UPON THAT

201
00:21:07.794 --> 00:21:13.031
INTERPRETATION AND THAT'S THE WAY ET HAD DONE IT
BEFORE THAT AND THAT'S THE WAY IT HAS

202
00:21:13.031 --> 00:21:20.128
DONE IT SINCE.  THAERS BEEN NO VER YAGS, VERIZON
HAS BEEN ROLLY AN EN CREDIBLE CORPORATE

203
00:21:20.128 --> 00:21:29.578
CITIZEN IN THIS, IN THIS MANNER AND IN THIS AREA.
EVEN WHEN IT DISPUTED FILING, HAVING

204
00:21:29.578 --> 00:21:35.734
TO FILE THIS RETURN AND HAVING TO PAY THITS TAX,
IF IT RECEIVED A TAX BILL, IT PAID IT

205
00:21:35.734 --> 00:21:39.388
AND THEN FILED A TAX APPEAL.              CHIEF
JUSTICE RABNER:  THERE'S NO QUESTION 

206
00:21:39.388 --> 00:21:43.716
BEFORE US ABOUT WHAT A GOOD CORPORATE CITIZEN
VERIZON IS WE'RE TRYING TO UNTHE STATUTE. 

207
00:21:43.716 --> 00:21:46.562
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  NO BROB, YOUR
HONOR, IEN.               JUSTICE SOLOMON: 

208
00:21:46.562 --> 00:21:54.767
TO SAY THAT THE LEGISLATURE UTILIZED VERIZON'S
DEFINITION OF THE LOCAL EXCHANGE.  I MEAN

209
00:21:54.767 --> 00:22:00.082
P I DON'T, I DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OR FRANKLY THE CASE THAT

210
00:22:00.082 --> 00:22:06.072
YOU TALKED ABOUT IN THE SUPREME COURT THAT
SUGGESTED THEY ADOPT THAT DEFINITION.  THEY

211
00:22:06.072 --> 00:22:09.851
ALWAYS REFER TON THE MAPS AND THE GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS.               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 

212
00:22:09.851 --> 00:22:15.994
THE LOIF HISTORY DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE
MAPS OR GEOGRAPHIC AREA OR THE DEFINITION

213
00:22:15.994 --> 00:22:18.964
OF THE.              JUSTICE SOLOMON:  I DPREE
WITH THAT.               NATALIE H. MANTELL: 

214
00:22:18.964 --> 00:22:23.511
AGAIN ANOTHER HE SHALL HEEFRPT BUT THE U.S.
SUPREME'S COURT DECISION DOES IN FACT COMPORT

215
00:22:23.511 --> 00:22:28.961
WITH VERIZON'S DEFINITION.               JUSTICE
SOLOMON:  WHICH DECISION?              

216
00:22:28.961 --> 00:22:39.414
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  THE VERIZON COMMUNICATION VES
THE FCC 535 U.S. 467.  AT PAGE 490 

217
00:22:39.414 --> 00:22:49.438
FROM 2002.  AND THE LANGUAGE IN THAT DECISION P IS
TELLING, I THINK.  IT SAYS A TRANSPORTATION

218
00:22:49.438 --> 00:22:55.414
NET FOR FOR COMMUNICATION SIGNAL NULTS, RADIATING
LOIK A ROOT SYSTEM FROM A CENTRAL OFFICE

219
00:22:55.414 --> 00:23:00.676
OR SEVERAL OFFICES FOR LARGER AREAS TO INDIVIDUAL
TELEPHONE, FAXES AND THE LIKE.              

220
00:23:00.676 --> 00:23:04.154
IT'S TALKING ABOUT THE SAME --             
JUSTICE SOLOMON:  DON'T THEY SPECIFICALLY 

221
00:23:04.154 --> 00:23:11.969
SAY WITHIN A GEOGRAPHIC AREA?  NETWORK CONNECTING
TERMINALS LIKE TELEPHONES, AND MODEM

222
00:23:11.969 --> 00:23:17.630
TO OTHER TERL NULS WITHIN A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA
LIKE A CITY.               NATALIE H.

223
00:23:17.630 --> 00:23:22.041
MANTELL:  YES, YOU WERE SOM SOL DOESN'T THAT SEEM
TO BE IP KICHT APARTMENT WITH WHAT YOU'RE

224
00:23:22.041 --> 00:23:25.983
ARGUING?               NATALIE H. MANTELL:  NO
BECAUSE THERE A GEOGRAPHICAL COMPONENT

225
00:23:25.983 --> 00:23:31.527
THO THIS, BUT WHAT THE MAP LOOKS LIKE IS DRIVEN
BY THE PEOPLE HOOL HAVE SEARCH AREA CODE

226
00:23:31.527 --> 00:23:37.310
AND EXCHANGES.  THERE IS A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA RS
THERE CAN BE A GEOGRAPHICAL AREA NOW. 

227
00:23:37.310 --> 00:23:48.102
BUT THE MAP IS ALL OEFRT PLACE RGS SO 0 TO SPEAK,
BECAUSE THE CUSTOMERS THE WITH THOETS

228
00:23:48.102 --> 00:23:57.266
NPA N.X X CODES FROM COMPETITIVE LOCAL EX CHAFRMG
COMPANIES AND VERN THE OTHER TWO ILECS

229
00:23:57.266 --> 00:24:02.690
ARE ALL OVER THE PLACE.  BUT THE REASON IT'S
IMPORTANT FOR THAT DEFINITION IS BECAUSE

230
00:24:02.690 --> 00:24:11.730
VERIZON, IF THE MAPS ARE USED NOW, VERIZON CAN'T
GO BACK AND SEEK A REFUND FROM THE

231
00:24:11.730 --> 00:24:17.121
MUNICIPALITIES WHERE IT PAID THE TAX BASED UPON
ITS CALCULATION OF THE, BASED UPON THE

232
00:24:17.121 --> 00:24:23.422
NPA/NXX CODES.  SO THERE ARE MUNICIPALITIES WHERE
VERIZON WOULD NOT HAVE HAD TO PAY THE

233
00:24:23.422 --> 00:24:32.491
TAX HAD IT RELIED ON THE MAPS.  BUT IT DID
BECAUSE IT RELIED ON THE NPA/NXX CODES.  AND

234
00:24:32.491 --> 00:24:41.256
THEN THERE ARE -- IN THOSE JURISDICTIONS, VERIZON
CAN'T GE BA, THE PEA NOT POSSIBLE TO

235
00:24:41.256 --> 00:24:49.224
GO BACK AND CHAFRMG THE CALCULATION NOW BECAUSE
VERIZON CAN'T SEEK A REFUND IN THOSE PLACES. 

236
00:24:49.224 --> 00:24:58.435
BUT SO THAT ALSO BRINGS ME TO A REQUEST.  SO IF
IN THE EVENT THE COURT DOES ADOCHT THE

237
00:24:58.435 --> 00:25:04.295
MAPS AS THE APPROACH THAT SHOULD BE USED, VERIZON
REQUESTS THAT IT ONLY DO SO PROSPECTIVELY

238
00:25:04.295 --> 00:25:12.102
FROM ITS DECISION.  THE FOR THE REASONS I JUST
SAID BECAUSE IT'S NOT, FRANKLY, IT'S NOT

239
00:25:12.102 --> 00:25:18.003
FAIR FOR VERIZON TO HAVE YOU'VE THE INDUSTRY
DEFINITION AND RELIED AND ON THE INDUSTRY

240
00:25:18.003 --> 00:25:26.841
DEFINITION KIFRT CYSTLY P NOT BE ABLE TO GO BACK
NOW.  IT PRESERVES ITS RIGHTS IN EVERY

241
00:25:26.841 --> 00:25:36.656
CASE WHERE IT MREEFSHS IT WAS NOT REQUIRED THE. 
IT WAS NOT REQUIRED TO PAY THE TAX AND

242
00:25:36.656 --> 00:25:48.179
FOR THE COURT TO CHAFRMG THAT NOW WOULD REALLY
BE, WOULD REALLY BE UNFAIR.              

243
00:25:48.179 --> 00:25:51.528
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER:  COIN SELL, WE'RE ABOUT 25
MIVENTS FRNS IS THERE ACHE YOU WOULD TLOIK

244
00:25:51.528 --> 00:26:02.030
ADD BEFORE WE BRIPG YOU BACK ON REBUTTAL?        
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  NO, YOUR HONOR

245
00:26:02.030 --> 00:26:12.098
RNGS I THINK I'VE COVERED EVERYTHING.  TR TAUR   
CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER:  MR. 

246
00:26:12.098 --> 00:26:16.853
TAURIELLO.               JOSEPH C. TAURIELLO: 
THANK YOU, YOUR HONORS.             MAY

247
00:26:16.853 --> 00:26:20.984
IT PLEASE THE COURT.             AS COUNSEL
INDICATED THE SINGLE ISSUE BEFORE THIS COURT

248
00:26:20.984 --> 00:26:27.107
IS THE TERM LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE WHICH IS
USED BY THE LEGISLATURE, BUT NOT DEAF FIEND

249
00:26:27.107 --> 00:26:33.243
IN THE OPERATIVE TAXING STATUTE.  THAT,
UNFORTUNATELY, IS PROBABLY WHERE OUR

250
00:26:33.243 --> 00:26:44.065
AGREEMENT ENDS.             THIS ISSUE REALLY
STAKES OUT DISPARATE POSITIONS, HOPEWELL,

251
00:26:44.065 --> 00:26:49.349
THE TRIAL COURT AND THE APPELLATE COURT TAKE THE
POSITION THAT A LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE

252
00:26:49.349 --> 00:26:56.431
IS A GEO PHOTOGRAPHIC KAL AREA DEFINED BY KNOWN
BOUNDARIES AND CONTRARY TO WHAT COUNSEL

253
00:26:56.431 --> 00:27:03.055
SAID HERE TODAY, SHE'S ACTUALLY DISAGREED WITH
THE TESTIMONY OF VERIZON'S EXPERT, MR. 

254
00:27:03.055 --> 00:27:08.573
WEST.             MR. WEST AND VERIZON TOOK THE
POSITION AT TRIAL AND AT THE APPELLATE

255
00:27:08.573 --> 00:27:13.692
COURT THAT A LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, AGAIN,
DESPITE WHAT WAS SAID HERE TODAY WAS A 

256
00:27:13.692 --> 00:27:19.867
THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT, NOT TETHERED TO IF WE OG
TRAF FEE AT ALL.  THAT WAS THE TESTIMONY

257
00:27:19.867 --> 00:27:30.083
AT TRIAL.             SO, THE PROBLEM WITH
VERIZON'S POSITION IS IT IS CONTRARY TO THE

258
00:27:30.083 --> 00:27:36.542
WAIKT OF THE EVIDENCE AND IT'S CONTRARY TO THEIR
OWN INTERNAL DOCUMENTS.  THE PRODUCT

259
00:27:36.542 --> 00:27:44.870
GUIDE THAT IS ON FILE WITH THE BPU TODAY SAYS
MAPS ARE CONTAINED IN SEPARATE BEEND DERS.

260
00:27:44.870 --> 00:27:50.940
THESE BINDERS CONTAIN A MAP FOR EACH EXCHANGE
AREA.  THE MAPS WHICH ARE PART OF THIS

261
00:27:50.940 --> 00:27:57.788
SECTION OF THIS PRODUCT GUIDE SHOW THE
TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES FOR EACH EXCHANGE

262
00:27:57.788 --> 00:28:04.320
AREA.             THAT STATEMENT WAS A HUNDRED
PERCENT CORRECT IN 1974 AND IT'S HUNDRED

263
00:28:04.320 --> 00:28:10.365
PERCENT TODAY AND MOST IMPORTANTLY IT WAS HUNDRED
PERCENT CORRECT ON THE DAY THE LEGISLATURE

264
00:28:10.365 --> 00:28:16.872
CRAFTED THE STATUTE.  THAT WAS IN THE PUBLIC
DOMAIN ON FILE WITH THE BPU IN THE FORM OF

265
00:28:16.872 --> 00:28:26.393
A TARIFF.             WHEN VERIZON CHANGED THE
TARIFF TO A PRODUCT GUIDE, THEY CHOSE TO

266
00:28:26.393 --> 00:28:31.890
ADOPT ALL OF THE VERBIAGE FROM THEIR TARIFF INTO
THE PRODUCT GUIDE, INCLUDING THOSE MAPs.

267
00:28:31.890 --> 00:28:37.630
SECOND, AS THE TRIAL AN APPELLATE
COURT CORRECTLY NOTED A LOCAL ACCESS AND

268
00:28:37.630 --> 00:28:44.452
TRAJS SPORT AREA OR A LATA ARE IMPORTANT ASPECTS
OF THE TELECOMMUNICATION REGULATORY

269
00:28:44.452 --> 00:28:52.487
FRAMEWORK.  WHERE THE GO OH GRAPHICALLY DEFINED
LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGES FORMED THE BUILDING

270
00:28:52.487 --> 00:28:59.185
BLOCKS OF THESE LATAS AND THEY WERE INTEGRAL TO
THE REGULATION OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

271
00:28:59.185 --> 00:29:09.094
INDUSTRY BECAUSE AFTER DEREGULATION THE BABY
BELLS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO COMPETE INTER-LATA,

272
00:29:09.094 --> 00:29:16.328
I GUESS.  THEY HAD TO STAY WITHIN THE THEIR LATA.
THEY HAD TO STAY WITHIN THEIR LANE. 

273
00:29:16.328 --> 00:29:24.248
THEY COULD NOT COMPETE INTO EXTERNAL LATAS SO
IT'S ALL ABOUT THE GEOGRAPHY.  THE LATAS

274
00:29:24.248 --> 00:29:30.344
ARE AN INTEGRAL COMPONENT OF THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNAL REGULATIONS.     

275
00:29:30.344 --> 00:29:41.419
THIRD VERIZON'S INTERNAL EXPERT, SAID AT
TRIAL AT S C.A. AT PAGE 47 THAT THAT THE

276
00:29:41.419 --> 00:29:46.737
DEFINITION OF A LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE COULD
NOT BE TIED TO ANY SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC

277
00:29:46.737 --> 00:29:53.726
AREA.  THAT WAS HIS TESTIMONY.             INDEED
HIS DIN THEY SIZED DEAF NIRGS RESULT

278
00:29:53.726 --> 00:30:01.132
IN DIAL TONE AND ACCESS LINES LOCATED IN TRENTON,
LOCATED IN ATLANTIC ZIT OR FOR THAT

279
00:30:01.132 --> 00:30:09.128
MATTER, LOCATED ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE STATE OF NEW
JERSEY TO FORM THE HOPEWELL LOCAL TELEPHONE

280
00:30:09.128 --> 00:30:15.194
EXCHANGE.             THAT COULD NOT BE WHAT THE
LEGISLATURE CONTEMPLATED AND I WOULD

281
00:30:15.194 --> 00:30:24.254
JUST ADD AS THIS COURT STATED IN ROAST V LOOIL
245 N J 105 IN 2021, THAT WHEN INTERPRETING

282
00:30:24.254 --> 00:30:32.391
THE LEGISLATIVE INTENT THE COURT SHOULD AVOID
ABSURD RESULTS.  I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THIS

283
00:30:32.391 --> 00:30:38.537
WOULD BE THE POSTER CHILD OF AN ABSURD RESULT IN
ALLOWING TELEPHONE AN ACCESS LINES SCATTERED

284
00:30:38.537 --> 00:30:44.944
THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY TO BE THE
SINGULAR DEFINITION OF A HOPEWELL LOCAL

285
00:30:44.944 --> 00:30:53.830
EXCHANGE.             AND ON CROSS-EXAMINATION,
MR. WEST WAS ASKED, BECAUSE HE TESTIFIED

286
00:30:53.830 --> 00:31:01.641
THAT THIS WAS HIS DEFINITION.  HE CREATED IT OUT
OF HIS 35 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE.  AND HE WAS

287
00:31:01.641 --> 00:31:15.130
ASKED THAT IF THERE WAS ANY DOCUMENTS -- LET ME
PHRASE IT THIS WAY.  HE CONCEDED THAT

288
00:31:15.130 --> 00:31:21.422
WHILE HE ADVOCATED HIS SYNTHESIZED DEFINITION HE
COULD NOT POINT TO A SINGLE AUTHORITY

289
00:31:21.422 --> 00:31:27.390
OR DOCUMENT THAT FLOID HIS DEFINITION OF A LOCAL
TELEPHONE EXCHANGE INCLUDING ALL OF VERIZON'S

290
00:31:27.390 --> 00:31:37.337
MAPS, ALL OF VERIZON'S PRIOR TARIFFS AN VERIZON'S
PRODUCT GUIDE.             FINALLY VERIZON'S

291
00:31:37.337 --> 00:31:43.387
POSITION IS NOT IN ACCORD WITH THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT COURT'S 2002 DESCRIPTION

292
00:31:43.387 --> 00:31:48.595
OF A LOCAL EXCHANGE WHICH I THINK WAS ALLUDED TO
IN THE COLLOQUY BEFORE WHERE THE U.S.

293
00:31:48.595 --> 00:31:54.503
SUPREME COURT DESCRIBED THE LOCAL EXCHANGE AS A
NETWORK CONNECTING TERMINALS LIKE TELEPHONES

294
00:31:54.503 --> 00:32:02.292
FAXES MODEMS AND OTHER TERMS ANALYSIS WITHIN A
GEOGRAPHIC AREA LIKE A CITY, CASE CITED

295
00:32:02.292 --> 00:32:09.489
AT PAGE 489 AND 490.             CONVERSELY,
HOPE, HOPEWELL CORRECTLY NOTED THE WIDESPREAD

296
00:32:09.489 --> 00:32:14.873
AND LONG HELD INDUSTRY PRACTICE DOCUMENT THAT A
LOCAL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE IS AS DEFINED

297
00:32:14.873 --> 00:32:21.425
BY VERIZON IN ITS LONG STANDING EXCHANGE MAPS
THAT HAVE REMAINED ON FILE WITH THE BOARD

298
00:32:21.425 --> 00:32:28.549
OF PUBLIC UTILITIES FROM THE EARLY 1970S.  THEY
WERE ON FILE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE ADOPTED

299
00:32:28.549 --> 00:32:35.773
THE STATUTE AN THEY ARE ON FILE TODAY.           
SO, AT BOTTOM, GEOGRAPHY AND BOUNDARIES

300
00:32:35.773 --> 00:32:42.818
MATTER WHEN YOU'RE DEFINING A MARKET.            
IN FACT, THE BOUNDARIES AN GEOGRAPHY

301
00:32:42.818 --> 00:32:50.075
ARE SO KRIT TAL TO UNDERTAKE AN ANALYSIS THAT
VERIZON'S OWN EXTERNAL EXPERT AT TRIAL,

302
00:32:50.075 --> 00:32:57.503
MR. VAN CONCEDED HE COULDN'T PROFFER HIS OPINION
OR DO HIS ANALYSIS WITHOUT RELYING ON

303
00:32:57.503 --> 00:33:04.016
THE LOCAL HOPEWELL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE MAP AND
THAT'S FOUND AT S C.A. AT PAGE 57.           

304
00:33:04.016 --> 00:33:09.863
THIS I WOULD SUBMIT IS A RATHER SIMPLE CASE TO
DECIDE.  THIS COURT SHOULD AFFIRM THE

305
00:33:09.863 --> 00:33:15.927
APPELLATE DIVISION'S AFFIRM MANS OF THE TRIAL
COURT BECAUSE ACCEPTING OF THE BURST

306
00:33:15.927 --> 00:33:22.135
DEFINITION OF A LOEL TELEPHONE EXCHANGE IS
CONSISTENT WITH THE COMMON AN HISTORICAL

307
00:33:22.135 --> 00:33:27.013
UNDERSTANDING WITHIN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
INDUSTRY.  IT'S CONSISTENT WITH VERIZON'S OWN

308
00:33:27.013 --> 00:33:33.631
PRODUCT GUIDE ON FILE WITH THE BPU AS WELL AS ITS
FORMER TAR RIFS AN IET LOCAL EXCHANGE

309
00:33:33.631 --> 00:33:39.629
MAPS WHICH HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED IN BOTH.  IT'S
CONSISTENT WITH THE ORIGINAL GEOGRAPHICAL

310
00:33:39.629 --> 00:33:45.905
CONSTRUCT OF A LATA WHICH STILL REMAIN IMPORTANT
TODAY AND IT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE MEANING

311
00:33:45.905 --> 00:33:52.358
ASCRIBED BY OTHERS WHETHER IT'S THE UNITED STATES
SUPREME COURT OR THE FCC OR NOOEL SENT

312
00:33:52.358 --> 00:34:00.729
OR THE OTHER NOOEL SENT OR OTHERS THAT VERIZON'S
EXPERT CITED IN HIS REPORT ALL RELYING

313
00:34:00.729 --> 00:34:07.891
ON BOUNDARIES; THAT'S HOW YOU TO AN ANALYSIS OF
THE MARKET.  YOU NEED TO KNOW THE PRODUCT

314
00:34:07.891 --> 00:34:13.326
YOU NEED TO KNOW THE MASHLTH THAT'S WHAT THIS
DOES.               JUSTICE SOLOMON:  I HAVE

315
00:34:13.326 --> 00:34:19.745
A QUESTION BECAUSE THIS IS SOMETHING I REALLY
HAVE DIFFICULTY XRE HENDING AMONG MANY

316
00:34:19.745 --> 00:34:25.018
DIFFERENT THIPGS IN THIS AREA, BUT THIS IS ONE,
VERIZON IS TAXED TO THE PROPERTY THAT THEY

317
00:34:25.018 --> 00:34:32.849
HAVE IN AN AREA AND THAT TAX IS BASED UPON THE
VALUE OR THE NATURE OF THAT PROPERTY, IT

318
00:34:32.849 --> 00:34:38.324
COULD BE, YOU KNOW, PIPES, WIRES, ALL THIS
INFRASTRUCTURE THAT ALL THE OTHER COMPANIES

319
00:34:38.324 --> 00:34:47.940
NOW USE APPARENTLY, BUT VERIZON USES, ALSO, AND
IT'S HOUSED IN A PARTICULAR AREA.  AND

320
00:34:47.940 --> 00:34:53.466
THAT THAT AREA DETERMINES HOW MUCH OF THAT STUFF
AND WHAT THE VALUE OF IT IS THAT IS TO BE

321
00:34:53.466 --> 00:34:58.996
TAXED IS WHAT IS REALLY BEING FOUGHT ABOUT HERE. 
DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE

322
00:34:58.996 --> 00:35:05.782
WHEN NOTHING VERIZON DOES ANYMORE, JUST BECAUSE
THEY HAVE THIS CENTER, THIS EXCHANGE CENTER

323
00:35:05.782 --> 00:35:15.448
IN HOPEWELL SERVES HOPEWELL.  IT SERVES PEOPLE
PROBABLY ALL OVER THE WORLD WHO HAVE VERIZON

324
00:35:15.448 --> 00:35:23.219
CELLPHONES, INCLUDING LINES AT AT&T AN MERRILL
LYNCH AN ELSEWHERE.             DOES THIS

325
00:35:23.219 --> 00:35:29.658
MAKE ANY SENSE FOR TAXING PURPOSES?              
DOES THIS IN ANY WAY FULFILL ANY PURPOSE

326
00:35:29.658 --> 00:35:39.904
OF THE TAX CODE TO TAX THEM BASED ON THIS STUFF
THAT SERVES A HUGE EX SPANS OF CUSTOMERS

327
00:35:39.904 --> 00:35:47.132
ALL OVER A REGION, A COUNTRY, MAYBE THE WORLD.   
I MEAN, I AM TRYING TO FIGURE

328
00:35:47.132 --> 00:35:56.829
OUT HOW THIS DEBATE BEARS ANY REASONABLE
RELATIONSHIP TO THIS TAX ISSUE ANY MORE?     

329
00:35:56.829 --> 00:36:01.502
JOSEPH C. TAURIELLO:  WELL, THERE IS A
LOT TO TRY AND ANSWER THERE.  I AM GOING

330
00:36:01.502 --> 00:36:10.730
TO START BY SAYING IT'S BEEN SOME TIME SINCE I
READ THE HISTORY OF THE DEREGULATION BECAUSE

331
00:36:10.730 --> 00:36:16.139
THAT WAS NOT A QUESTION BEFORE THIS COURT SO I AM
GOING TO RELY UPON MY MEMORY WHICH CAN BE

332
00:36:16.139 --> 00:36:23.788
-- SOMETIMES IT CAN COMBET ME IN TROUBLE.        
JOSEPH C. TAURIELLO:  DOES THAT

333
00:36:23.788 --> 00:36:29.834
MATTER IN THIS CASE.              JOSEPH C.
TAURIELLO:  YES, IT DOES.  IT'S CRITICAL IN

334
00:36:29.834 --> 00:36:35.258
THIS CASE AN ACTUALLY WHAT COUNSEL HAD REQUESTED
AS A RELIEF OF APPLYING IT PROSPECTIVELY,

335
00:36:35.258 --> 00:36:41.193
BASICALLY WHAT THEY ARE SAYING IS THEY DON'T WANT
TO PAY A TAX FROM 2009 FORWARD BECAUSE

336
00:36:41.193 --> 00:36:48.334
I THINK IF WE WERE TO DO A MARKET ANALYSIS IN THE
HOPEWELL LOCAL EXCHANGE IN 2024 THEY

337
00:36:48.334 --> 00:36:53.811
PROBABLY DON'T HAVE 51 PERCENT AND THE TAX THEY
ARE SUBJECT TO WOULD HAVE BEEN SUNSETED

338
00:36:53.811 --> 00:37:01.066
BY THAT POINT.             THERE ARE 200 PLUS
LOCAL EXCHANGES IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY

339
00:37:01.066 --> 00:37:09.325
AT A PARTICULAR -- I THINK VERIZON IS THE
INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE IN 180 OF THEM SO

340
00:37:09.325 --> 00:37:16.132
IT'S NOT JUST THAT THERE IS A HOPEWELL LOCAL
EXCHANGE THERE IS SOME 200 OF THEM AN

341
00:37:16.132 --> 00:37:20.900
WHEREVER THE PROPERTY IS SITUATED, THAT PERSONAL
PROPERTY THAT IS SITUATED, THE LEGISLATURE

342
00:37:20.900 --> 00:37:25.457
CHOSE THE SCHEME AND THIS IS WHERE IT KIND OF
TIES INTO DEREGULATION BECAUSE THERE WAS

343
00:37:25.457 --> 00:37:32.010
A SHUFFLE WITH THE C B T TAX AND THIS OTHER TAX,
THE MUNICIPALITY AS THE TAXING STATUTES

344
00:37:32.010 --> 00:37:38.040
WERE CHANGING AND PLAYING MUSICAL CHAIRS, IT WAS
THE MUNICIPALITY THAT WAS LOSING THE

345
00:37:38.040 --> 00:37:47.178
OPPORTUNITY TO GET REVENUE TO BLANK.             
THE COMPROMISE AS I UNDERSTOOD IT WAS

346
00:37:47.178 --> 00:37:52.513
THEY WILL AT LEAST GET THIS TAX FOR THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY BECAUSE IT WAS

347
00:37:52.513 --> 00:37:59.097
AT&T THROUGH THE DEREGULATION THAT WOUND UP PAYING
THE KRB T TAX BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T 

348
00:37:59.097 --> 00:38:05.043
A LOCAL KRAR YER ANYMORE SO THIS WAS HOW THE
LEGISLATURE ALLOWED FOR THE MUNICIPALITIES

349
00:38:05.043 --> 00:38:12.339
TO CONTINUE TO RECEIVE TAXING REVENUE.  I THINK
THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION.             AND,

350
00:38:12.339 --> 00:38:20.434
YES, IT MATTERS BECAUSE THERE IS IN -- I WILL
JUST USE HOPEWELL AS AN EXAMPLE, COUNSEL

351
00:38:20.434 --> 00:38:26.286
SAID VERIZON IS A GOOD CITIZEN BECAUSE THEY PAY
THEIR TAXES.  WELL, THE TRUTH IS AS THIS

352
00:38:26.286 --> 00:38:32.776
COURT KNOWS YOU DON'T HAVE STANDING TO FILE A TAX
APPEAL UNLESS YOU FILE YOUR TAXES. 

353
00:38:32.776 --> 00:38:39.454
THEY PAID FROM 2009 THROUGH -- BECAUSE THAT'S THE
ONLY WAY THEY GET STANDING TO CHALLENGE

354
00:38:39.454 --> 00:38:47.188
THE TAX.  AND THAT MONEY, IF THIS COURT WAS TO
CHANGE THE RULES OF THE FWAM, CHANGE THE

355
00:38:47.188 --> 00:38:53.899
LONG HELD UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT A LOCAL TELEPHONE
EXCHANGE IS, IT WOULD ALLOW VERIZON

356
00:38:53.899 --> 00:39:01.395
TO GET OUT OF THE TAX THAT THEY OTHERWISE OWE. 
IT MATTERS A GREAT DEAL.  IT MATTERS

357
00:39:01.395 --> 00:39:08.893
CERTAINLY A COMBRAT DEAL TO MY CLIENT.  IT DOES. 
I THINK -- I HOPE I ANSWERED.             

358
00:39:08.893 --> 00:39:12.736
JUSTICE SOLOMON:  OH, NO, YOU DID.  YOU DID.      
JUSTICE PIERRE-LOUIS:  WHAT

359
00:39:12.736 --> 00:39:19.187
IS YOUR RESPONSE TO COUNSEL'S ARGUMENT THAT NOT
ONLY DID DEREGULATION CHANGE THE CLUSTERS

360
00:39:19.187 --> 00:39:27.734
OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL AREA, BUT SO DID TECHNOLOGY
SO THAT NOW THERE ARE NUMBERS WELL OUTSIDE

361
00:39:27.734 --> 00:39:35.162
THE HOPEWELL AREA THAT HAVE THE NPA AN NXX THAT
WAS NOT THE CASE IN PRIOR YEARS?             

362
00:39:35.162 --> 00:39:38.991
JOSEPH C. TAURIELLO:  TWO THINGS.            
FIRST IT WAS NEVER THE CASE THAT LOCAL 

363
00:39:38.991 --> 00:39:45.541
EXCHANGE WAS DIVIDED BY NPA, NXX CODES, DESPITE
COUNSEL'S STATEMENT TODAY THAT THAT WAS

364
00:39:45.541 --> 00:39:52.751
THE INDUSTRY STANDARD AND LONG HELD, WHAT IS
CONSPICUOUSLY ABSENT IS A SINGLE DOCUMENT

365
00:39:52.751 --> 00:39:57.890
THAT POENTS TO THAT FACT.  WHAT THERE IS IS AN
INUNDATION OF DOCUMENTS THAT SHOW THAT

366
00:39:57.890 --> 00:40:03.268
A LOCAL EXCHANGE IS AS DEFINED IN THEIR PRODUCT
GUIDE WHICH IS BY TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES.

367
00:40:03.268 --> 00:40:09.073
WHAT VERIZON HAS DONE IS THEY HAVE
CONFLATED THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A RATE

368
00:40:09.073 --> 00:40:16.605
CENTER AND A LOCAL EXCHANGE.  AND A RATE CENTER
IS NOT A GEOGRAPHICAL.  IT'S ON A MAP. 

369
00:40:16.605 --> 00:40:21.741
IT'S JUST A POINT.  AND A RATE CENTER, WHICH IS
BECOMING LESS IMPORTANT TODAY BECAUSE

370
00:40:21.741 --> 00:40:27.714
OF THE TYPES OF TELEPHONE PLANS WE HAVE, BUT BACK
IN THE DAY, IT WAS YOU WOULD BE CHARGED

371
00:40:27.714 --> 00:40:35.845
A -- FOR YOUR PHONE CALL BASED UPON THE MILEAGE
BETWEEN THE TWO RATE CENTERS, POINT A

372
00:40:35.845 --> 00:40:42.290
TO POINT B, AGAIN THAT IS BECOMING LESS RELEVANT
TODAY, BUT THAT IS THE -- THE NPA-NXXES

373
00:40:42.290 --> 00:40:48.205
ARE ASSIGNED TO RATE CENTERS NOT TO AN EXCHANGE
SO WHAT THERE HAS BEEN IN MY OPINION IS

374
00:40:48.205 --> 00:40:55.383
A CON FLAKES BETWEEN THOSE TWO DOCUMENTS EVEN
THOUGH THEIR EXPERT, MR. WEST CONCEDED ON

375
00:40:55.383 --> 00:41:00.587
CROSS-EXAMINATION THAT THEY ARE TWO SEPARATE
THINGS.              JUSTICE WAINER APTER: 

376
00:41:00.587 --> 00:41:08.584
EXCEPT I THINK COUNSEL SAID THAT THE WAY THE MAP
WAS CREATED IN 1974 WAS BY LOOKING, OKAY,

377
00:41:08.584 --> 00:41:15.442
WHERE ARE ALL THE NPA-NXX CODES ASSOCIATED WITH
THE HOPEWELL RATE CENTER AND NOW LET'S

378
00:41:15.442 --> 00:41:20.465
CREATE A MAP WHERE ALL THOSE CODES WERE INSIDE OF
IT AN THEN WE WILL DO THE SAME THING

379
00:41:20.465 --> 00:41:25.875
WITH THE OTHER 208 LOCAL EXCHANGES.            
IT SEEMS LIKE YOU'RE CONTESTING THAT,

380
00:41:25.875 --> 00:41:29.659
BUT THEN HOW WAS THE MAP CREATED?              
JOSEPH C. TAURIELLO:  I WILL ANSWER YOUR

381
00:41:29.659 --> 00:41:34.520
QUESTION THIS WAY.  WHAT COUNSEL SAID TODAY IS
NOT SUPPORTED IN THE RECORD BELOW.  THERE WAS

382
00:41:34.520 --> 00:41:41.305
NO TESTIMONY REGARDING THAT THAT I AM AWARE OF
THAT THAT WAS HOW THE MAP WAS CREATED.

383
00:41:41.305 --> 00:41:44.139
JUSTICE WAINER APTER:  HOW WAS THE
MAP CREATED?               JOSEPH C.

384
00:41:44.139 --> 00:41:48.103
TAURIELLO:  I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.  I
DON'T KNOW.  IT WAS NOT AN ISSUE AT EITHER

385
00:41:48.103 --> 00:41:52.730
THE TRIAL OR APPELLATE LEL.  THE ISSUE WAS
WHETHER OR NOT THE LOCAL EXCHANGE IS DEFINED

386
00:41:52.730 --> 00:41:59.649
BY THE MAPS THAT WERE CREATED BY VERIZON.  NO ONE
DISPUTED THAT THEY WERE CREATED, BUT

387
00:41:59.649 --> 00:42:05.557
TO SUGGEST THAT SOMEHOW THAT DID NOT REPRESENT
WHAT THE UNDERSTANDING WAS IS JUST FACTUALLY

388
00:42:05.557 --> 00:42:12.418
NOT CORRECT.  ESPECIALLY AT THE TIME WHEN THE
LEGISLATURE ADOPTED THE STATUTE.            

389
00:42:12.418 --> 00:42:17.987
I ALSO JUST WANTED TO COMMENT.  I DIDN'T WANT TO
INTERRUPT COUNSEL ON HER OPENING, BUT

390
00:42:17.987 --> 00:42:23.729
SHE REFERENCED AN ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION AND
I DOUBLE CHECKED THE BRIEFS THAT WERE

391
00:42:23.729 --> 00:42:29.641
SUBMITTED.  L UNLESS I AM MISSING IT.  I DON'T
SEE THAT THAT WAS IN THE BRIEFS I DON'T KNOW

392
00:42:29.641 --> 00:42:33.834
WHAT THAT SECTION IS.  I JUST WANT THE COURT TO
KNOW THAT THE REASON I AM NOT PREPARED

393
00:42:33.834 --> 00:42:38.943
TO ADDRESS IT IS IT WAS NOT RAISED AT THE TRIAL
LEVEL, THE APPELLATE LEVEL AN NOT RAISED

394
00:42:38.943 --> 00:42:43.193
IN THE BRIEFS SUBMITTED TO THIS COURT SO I
APOLOGIZE I AM NOT PREPARED TO ADDRESS THAT. 

395
00:42:43.193 --> 00:42:47.184
SFLFRNLTS OTHER QUESTIONS ANYONE?              
THANK YOU, COUNSEL.              JOSEPH C.

396
00:42:47.184 --> 00:42:50.918
TAURIELLO:  THANK YOU SFLFRNLTS MS. MANTELL, BRIEF
REBUTTAL?  HAD.              NATALIE H.

397
00:42:50.918 --> 00:43:45.248
MANTELL:  YES, YOUR HONOR.              YOUR
HONOR, JUST A FEW POINTS.             I WOULD

398
00:43:45.248 --> 00:43:52.765
LIKE TO DIRECT THE COURT TO DAY 1 OF THE TRIAL
TRANSCRIPT WHERE MR. WEST, VERIZON'S WITNESS,

399
00:43:52.765 --> 00:44:01.868
PAGE 73 TESTIFIED THAT THE MAP WAS BASED UPON THE
ASSIGNED NPA-NXX CODES AND THE CUSTOMER'S

400
00:44:01.868 --> 00:44:11.757
LOCATIONS IN 1974.             ALSO, AT PAGE 5 OF
VERIZON'S REPLY BRIEF IN THIS MATTER

401
00:44:11.757 --> 00:44:21.482
ON THE PETITION, WE CITE THE NEW JERSEY
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 14: 14-3.1 IN

402
00:44:21.482 --> 00:44:35.269
FOOTNOTE 3.  AND I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS A COUPLE
OF OTHER POENTS IN COUNSEL'S ARGUMENT.

403
00:44:35.269 --> 00:44:44.633
THE FIRST BEING THAT COUNSEL SAID
THAT THE -- WHEN THE TAXING STRUCTURE OR

404
00:44:44.633 --> 00:44:52.418
WHEN THE TAXING STATUTES WERE ALL RESTRUCTURED
HIS UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT THE BP TT WAS

405
00:44:52.418 --> 00:44:59.268
SUPPOSED TO ESSENTIALLY POLICE THE GRAPH TAX FOR
THE MUNICIPALITIES; THAT'S NOT ACCURATE.

406
00:44:59.268 --> 00:45:10.140
IN THE ASSEMBLY STATEMENT CLOP
ESSENTIALLY REPLACE THE CLOP.             

407
00:45:10.140 --> 00:45:15.786
THE ASSEMBLY POLICY AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT
COMMITTEE STATEMENT WHICH IS AVAILABLE IN

408
00:45:15.786 --> 00:45:28.497
THE RECORD AT VERIZON'S REPLY APPENDIX IN THE
APPELLATE DIVISION, P R A 0094 TO 96.  IT

409
00:45:28.497 --> 00:45:34.622
DESCRIBES THE FACT THAT THE GROSS RECEIPTS AN
FRANCHISE TAX WAS BEING ELIMINATED BUT IT

410
00:45:34.622 --> 00:45:40.578
WAS BEING REPLACED BY THE CORPORATION BUSINESS
TAX AND THERE WAS A SPRT FUND THAT WAS

411
00:45:40.578 --> 00:45:50.069
BEING CREATED WHICH WOULD REPLACE THE REVENUE
FROM THE GRAPH TAX.  THE BPT WAS NOT INTENDED

412
00:45:50.069 --> 00:45:56.154
IN ANY WAY TO REPLACE THE REVENUE FROM
MUNICIPALITIES; THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE

413
00:45:56.154 --> 00:46:04.583
REPLACED BY THE CORPORATION BUSINESS TAX AND THEN
THE STATE FUND THAT WAS CREATED.            

414
00:46:04.583 --> 00:46:13.713
ALSO, WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER OR NOT THE TAX WOULD
STILL BE BEING PAID BY VERIZON IF THE

415
00:46:13.713 --> 00:46:27.205
MAPS WERE USED, THEY WOULD NOT.  THE IN FLUKS OF
COMPETITION HAS CREATED A SITUATION WHERE

416
00:46:27.205 --> 00:46:37.034
NOW IN MANY, MANY OF THE LP Es, REGARDLESS OF
WHETHER THE MAPS ARE USED OR THE NPA-NXX

417
00:46:37.034 --> 00:46:44.168
CODES HAVE USED VERIZON'S MARKET SHARE HAS FALLEN
BELOW 51 PERCENT.             SPECIFICALLY

418
00:46:44.168 --> 00:46:49.011
IN HOPEWELL THE REASON HOPEWELL CONTINUES TO PAY
THE TAX IS BECAUSE HOPEWELL'S TAX ASSESSOR

419
00:46:49.011 --> 00:47:00.612
CONTINUES TO RELY ON THE 2008 FORM P P-10 THAT
WAS SUBMITTED TO ISSUE THE TAX YEAR AFTER

420
00:47:00.612 --> 00:47:11.187
YEAR AFTER YEAR.  THEY HAVE NOT -- THEY HAVE NOT
DONE ANYTHING TO BRING THAT CURRENT.

421
00:47:11.187 --> 00:47:16.240
JUSTICE SOLOMON:  THAT'S NOT OUR
ISSUE; THAT'S NOT WHAT HERE.              

422
00:47:16.240 --> 00:47:19.575
NATALIE H. MANTELL:  IT IS NOT.  I WAS JUST
RESPONDING TO WHAT COUNSEL SAID, YOUR HONOR.

423
00:47:19.575 --> 00:47:26.625
BUT TO THAT POINT, REGARDLESS OF
WHETHER THE NPA-NXX CODES OR THE MAPs ARE

424
00:47:26.625 --> 00:47:37.098
USED, IN MANY, MANY OF THE JURISDICTIONS, THERE
IS NO TAX BECAUSE -- VERIZON NO LONGER

425
00:47:37.098 --> 00:47:47.147
HAS 51 PERCENT.             FINALLY, YOUR HONOR,
IN 1997 WHEN THIS STATUTE WAS ENACTED

426
00:47:47.147 --> 00:47:53.760
THE LEGISLATURE IS PRESUMED TO UNDERSTAND
INDUSTRY TERMINOLOGY WHEN IT USES AN INDUSTRY

427
00:47:53.760 --> 00:48:00.493
TERM OF ART IN ITS STATUTE AT THAT TIME VERIZON
WAS THE INDUSTRY.  IT WAS NEW JERSEY BELL

428
00:48:00.493 --> 00:48:07.321
THEN, BUT THERE WAS A MONOPOLY.  VERIZON WAS THE
INDUSTRY WHEN THIS STATUTE WAS ENACTED

429
00:48:07.321 --> 00:48:14.539
AND ITS DEFINITION THAT IT HAS USED SINCE THAT
TIME THROUGH TODAY IS WHAT LOCAL TELEPHONE

430
00:48:14.539 --> 00:48:18.460
EXCHANGE MEANS.               THE COURT:  THANK
YOU, COUNSEL.             THANK YOU TO

431
00:48:18.460 --> 00:48:21.460
 BOTH COUNSEL, WE WILL TAKE THE MATTER UN
ADVISEMENT.

